骗子假冒 imToken 市场部门人员联系非小号，将非小号中的 imToken 下载地址篡改为骗子网站，imToken 安全团队发现后已第一时间联系非小号进行修正。
Sorry to hear that. it is necessary to state that imToken won't custody your belongings; you're fully to blame for the safety of the belongings.
为了保障用户资产安全、打造优质加密生态，imToken 致力于普及安全资讯并提供解决方案。
dreadful experience, as complicated and as costly to make use of as is possible. Will uninstall as shortly I am able to eliminate my tokens. I do not realize why they've designed it so challenging to remove tokens off application scammy.
近来，随着数字货币的火爆，市场上涌现了大量假冒的数字货币钱包。这些假钱包外观上与正版几乎无异，但其内在却暗藏木马程序，一旦用户将资产转入这些假钱包，便会被黑客窃取，给用户造成了难以估量的损失。尤其是知名的imToken钱包，由于其用户基数庞大，成为了假冒者的主要目标。
骗子潜伏在各微信群，冒充 imToken 官方人员。为了博取用户信任还给用户提供虚假 imToken 工作证。向用户发送海报或链接，诱导用户下载假 imToken。
Quite simply, imToken doesn't have the chance to accessibility your assets.We suggest reporting it into the law enforcement. if you want any support, be sure to contact us via e mail at [email protected]
A pressured blood attract constitutes a "refusal" in California. Refusing a chemical take a look at has extreme effects, which include fines, jail time, and suspension from the copyright.
● effectively handle several accounts throughout a variety of networks inside a single wallet employing a list of mnemonic phrases. Also, build many unbiased accounts throughout the very same community.
incredibly poor encounter I place 500 bucks in it now and these people took out the many pounds please Do not download this fake individuals phony app ???????? third class services
加一個夜間模式，很難？郵件反饋了一年了，每次都說“謝謝建議”，一年了沒動靜？還有系統通知的適配，什麼時候能完善？交易通知經常延遲，延遲三小時以內都算速度快了。每次都要手動打開去查看交易
抱歉在使用 imToken 时给你造成了疑惑，如果你是确认从正规渠道下载的 imToken ，那么可以无视风险提示继续安装使用。这些风险提示一般是部分地区（如中国大陆）的部分手机厂商、系统的提示，属于误报。imToken 正在努力解决这些不可控因素，致力于给用户带来良好的使用体验。再次感谢你对我们的支持和反馈！
安全始于了解开发者如何收集和分享数据。数据隐私保护和安全措施可能会因您的使用情况、所在地区和用户年龄而异。此类信息由开发者提供，可能会随时间更新。
imToken is often a responsible Web3 electronic more info wallet dependable by tens of millions, enabling easy access to 35+ significant networks including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tron.
Forced blood draws are allowed beneath the 1966 U.S. Supreme court docket situation of Schmerber v. California. The courtroom ruled that police may take a driver's blood with out a warrant to be able to conduct a chemical take a look at.